Global reactions to US aggression in – World | BelarusVC
Belarus Virtual Consult

Bridging the World to Belarus

Your trusted gateway to opportunities.

Global reactions to US aggression in

Many countries criticized U.S. actions, while some expressed support

Global reactions to US aggression in

Thin diplomatic tensions intensified after statements that the United States had taken aggressive measures against Venezuela. Belarus, Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, Colombia, and several other countries openly condemned American actions. The Minsk president noted that the U.S. could plunge Venezuela into a 'second Vietnam'.

The Colombian head of state reported the deployment of additional forces along the border with Venezuela and announced that, in case of a refugee influx, all resources would be mobilized to provide assistance. European responses were cautious: Brussels emphasized 'deep concern' but failed to establish a clear stance, while Germany maintained a distinct tone of neutrality, and Spain focused on the need to uphold UN principles.

Kaja Kallas, a legislative representative, called Maduro an illegitimate president and urged Washington to abide by international law. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk clarified that Poland is 'monitoring' the events and preparing for possible consequences, noting the unexpected nature of the strike on Caracas.

Within the United States, the Senate confirmed that the official position remains unchanged: Maduro is not considered a legitimate president. Other countries, such as Argentina, announced support for the U.S. response, sparking sharp disputes.

The situation remains tense: no further actions in Venezuela are expected at present, American institutions reported.

Context

In 2020, an operation to abduct Maduro named 'Gideon' was planned, involving the private military company 'Silvercorp' and Colombian mercenaries, but most of them were arrested.

Summary:

Countries worldwide responded to U.S. aggression in Venezuela, either condemning or supporting the actions. Reactions ranged from criticism to readiness to assist refugees, while European nations remained cautious.